Navigation guided by natural language instructions presents a challenging reasoning problem for instruction followers. Natural language instructions typically identify only a few high-level decisions and landmarks rather than complete low-level motor behaviors; much of the missing information must be inferred based on perceptual context. In machine learning settings, this is doubly challenging: it is difficult to collect enough annotated data to enable learning of this reasoning process from scratch, and also difficult to implement the reasoning process using generic sequence models. Here we describe an approach to vision-and-language navigation that addresses both these issues with an embedded speaker model. We use this speaker model to (1) synthesize new instructions for data augmentation and to (2) implement pragmatic reasoning, which evaluates how well candidate action sequences explain an instruction. Both steps are supported by a panoramic action space that reflects the granularity of human-generated instructions. Experiments show that all three components of this approach---speaker-driven data augmentation, pragmatic reasoning and panoramic action space---dramatically improve the performance of a baseline instruction follower, more than doubling the success rate over the best existing approach on a standard benchmark.

However, there's a lack of insight into how these models perform in terms

BoT has the potential to surpass Llama3-70B model.

A.1 Prototype-based Graph Information Bottleneck - Eq. 4 From Eq. 3, the GIB objective is: min We perform ablation studies to examine the effectiveness of our model (i.e., PGIB and PGIB In Figure 7, the " with all " setting represents our final model that includes all the components. We conduct experiments on graph classification using different readout functions for PGIB. We illustrate the reasoning process on two datasets, i.e., MUT AG and BA2Motif, in Figure 8. PGIB Then, PGIB computes the "points contributed" to predicting each class by multiplying the similarity We have conducted additional qualitative analysis. It is crucial that the prototypes not only contain key structural information from the input graph but also ensure a certain level of diversity since each class is represented by multiple prototypes. Its goal is to make the masked subgraph's prediction as close as possible to the original graph, which helps to detect substructures significant